|
|
Post by blah on Nov 8, 2014 14:27:21 GMT -6
Yes, smngry, that's exactly the fuck my point. That's BEEN my point. That's what I was trying to tell Matt.
|
|
|
|
Post by smngry on Nov 8, 2014 14:32:06 GMT -6
Yes, smngry, that's exactly the fuck my point. That's BEEN my point. That's what I was trying to tell Matt. so I restate my point... Why would they make it obvious it was a dream... During the actual dream? Why would they shatter the illusion and the effect of the revelation that we've just witnessed a dream? That is my point. Also I'm all for colourful language when used in the right context, but get shirty and I think you'll find the people here are giving you enough rope to hang yourself. Calm down |
|
|
|
Post by blah on Nov 8, 2014 17:50:08 GMT -6
I'm not saying they would make it obvious during the dream. Metal Matt said while watching the scene that he knew it was a dream because it was through POV, and I was saying that that isn't compelling enough evidence to suggest it was a dream.
|
|
|
|
Post by Metal Matt on Nov 8, 2014 17:50:59 GMT -6
It's called a theory. Several people can have several different theories about a scene.  |
|
|
|
Post by blah on Nov 8, 2014 17:52:01 GMT -6
Oh my god I'm not even saying you're wrong or talking to you anymore in the first place! We cleared our situation up. Goddamn. Now I'm working on the other guy who's twisting my words.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spanky on Nov 8, 2014 18:03:12 GMT -6
Chill out dude, your attitude doesn't help here.
|
|
|
|
Post by blah on Nov 8, 2014 18:06:07 GMT -6
Don't pay attention to the attitude, because I don't mean for it to come across as attitude. Pay attention to the points I'm making. All I EVER said was that having the opening scene of Seed be a POV shot wasn't compelling enough evidence that it was a dream. That's it. Obviously we all know it's a dream once Glen wakes up. I wasn't talking about that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spanky on Nov 8, 2014 18:08:36 GMT -6
When we are a community trying to get along, a bad attitude will not be tolerated, even if you say you're making valid points, there's a better tone to have. I've warned you in another thread, consider it your last before you get a time-out.
|
|
|
|
Post by blah on Nov 8, 2014 18:09:49 GMT -6
But I luv Chucky.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dragon Prime on Nov 8, 2014 18:50:06 GMT -6
So Glen was having a dream within... a dream?
|
|
|
|
Post by Metal Matt on Nov 8, 2014 18:50:26 GMT -6
INCEPTION
|
|
|
|
Post by Dragon Prime on Nov 8, 2014 18:53:02 GMT -6
Also... Lori Strode's nightmare at the beginning of H20 was from her POV.
|
|
|
|
Post by smngry on Nov 8, 2014 18:58:57 GMT -6
Well to me, right here it looks as though you have a theory about the ending being a dream. Another memeber says it would be more obvious if that was the case. You then say quite clearly that it wasn't obvious Glen's first scene was a a dream.
Our point is, no it wasn't obvious, not until they 'wanted' us to know it was a dream.
If they wanted us to know the ending was a dream, they would have applied the same touch to the ending as they did to the beginning.
Do you even know what you're talking about anymore?
|
|
|
|
Post by blah on Nov 9, 2014 0:38:50 GMT -6
Also... Lori Strode's nightmare at the beginning of H20 was from her POV. None of the nightmares in any of the A NIGHTMARE From Elm Street movies were from the victims' POV. So there. Har har. |
|
|
|
Post by blah on Nov 9, 2014 0:44:20 GMT -6
Well to me, right here it looks as though you have a theory about the ending being a dream. Another memeber says it would be more obvious if that was the case. You then say quite clearly that it wasn't obvious Glen's first scene was a a dream. Our point is, no it wasn't obvious, not until they 'wanted' us to know it was a dream. If they wanted us to know the ending was a dream, they would have applied the same touch to the ending as they did to the beginning. Do you even know what you're talking about anymore? Ok, I don't even know how you managed to tie yourself into all these knots. I'm trying to be patient, nice and clear with you. 1) Matt said it was obvious Glen's dream sequence at the beginning of the film was a dream because it was done in a POV. I then said that it merely being POV wasn't compelling enough evidence to suggest that it was a dream. 2) I think the ending was intended to be a dream because it DID apply the same touch as the beginning. That touch being: a child receiving a gift from an unknown sender. It wasn't done through POV obviously, but it still utilized the notion of: a child receiving a gift from an unknown sender. That's all I'm basing my theory on. |
|
Jul 19, 2020 17:45:08 GMT -6
Jul 19, 2020 17:45:08 GMT -6
